In a country caught in the grip of political upheaval and factionalism, the question looms large: Can an illegitimate president, who ascended to power through questionable means, appoint a finance minister capable of turning around the nation’s fortunes?

This leader, whose rise to power followed a military coup, is accused of rigging elections and committing numerous human rights violations. The government, a reflection of his commandist style, is criticized for failing to uphold the country’s security and sovereignty. Critics argue that this president and his administration are more focused on self-enrichment and maintaining power than on genuine leadership.

The backdrop of this political drama is a country in crisis, grappling with severe factionalism described as the worst tragedy it has ever faced. The administration is characterized as a criminal enterprise, embroiled in corruption and blamed for causing state paralysis. In such a scenario, the prospect of appointing a competent and professional finance minister seems bleak.

The general populace, particularly the rural electorate, remains largely uninformed about the full extent of the government’s dysfunction. Many depend on the government for basic necessities, despite its deep-seated problems. They are unaware of the bloated and ineffective state of the various ministries, which are described as militarized and politicized extensions of the ruling party.

Observers note that the appointment of a truly capable finance minister would require a shift towards genuine economic reforms. However, such a move would potentially undermine the current president’s grip on power. Reforms might include curbing illicit government spending designed to secure the loyalty of the security sector and other key agencies, which have been criticized for their overt politicization and lack of transparency.

These agencies include the anti-corruption commission, the judiciary, and the electoral commission – all of which are said to support the establishment of a one-party state. Furthermore, the national media and the prosecuting authority are accused of serving as propaganda tools for the ruling party, rather than acting as independent bodies.

The current finance minister, despite being touted as a technocrat, is now a candidate for the ruling party, which has been accused of undermining the country’s constitution and enriching its leaders at the expense of the populace. This development has led to doubts about his ability and intentions, as it seems he may not be the reformist he was once thought to be.

In conclusion, the chances of a leader, mired in illegitimacy and corruption, successfully appointing a minister capable of addressing the country’s economic challenges are slim. The pattern of governance suggests a continuation of self-serving policies that prioritize power retention over national welfare. The country’s journey towards stability and prosperity appears fraught with obstacles, with little indication of a change in direction from the top.