In a country that relies heavily on imports due to Statutory Instrument (SI 64), a ban on used vehicles seems strange and unhelpful. Zimbabwe’s attempt at protectionism by Zanu PF raises questions about whether shielding industries from imports actually works and fails to fix the real economic problems. The focus should be on fixing the man-made crisis with full reforms, not on protectionist moves.

Thinking that protecting the motor industry from imports will fix trade imbalances ignores the deeper problems of Zimbabwe’s economy. Trade deficits continue because imports are of lower value compared to higher value-added exports like raw agricultural goods and minerals. A key shift towards economic and political reforms is needed to address these big issues.

For a stronger economic recovery, it is crucial to separate the party (Zanu PF) from the state. This separation is important in stopping corruption and promoting real economic progress. Such reforms should challenge the old ways of the settler-capitalist mode of production, creating an environment good for growth and stability.

The protectionist approach by Zanu PF, aimed at shielding key industries, contradicts Zimbabwe’s serious economic situation. With high inflation, growing debt, and a flawed tax system leading to tax evasion, the focus should be on clear policies, private property rights, and rule of law to revive and modernize the industry.

The political deadlock caused by Zanu PF’s push for a one-party state blocks the needed reforms for economic revival. Budget problems from deficit spending and bad policies further harm the economy. This decline, seen in a shrinking industry, needs full remedies rather than just protectionist gestures.

The Economic Structural Adjustment Program (ESAP) tried to fix the economic damage caused by Zanu PF’s socialist policies. However, diplomatic issues with Western countries stopped it from working well, showing the need to move away from wrong socialism. The protectionist stance ignores the main causes of Zimbabwe’s economic troubles and fails to provide a real solution.

Zanu PF’s “Look East Policy” worsened industry problems by exposing local businesses to competitive imports, leading to closures and unemployment. Rather than focusing on citizens’ welfare, Zanu PF’s focus on staying in power has harmed economic stability. Without real reforms, the protectionist approach is useless, as it doesn’t solve the main issues.

A bad tax system and rising inflation have reduced consumer buying power, making citizens turn to cheaper imports. Zanu PF’s self-serving rule, along with inconsistent policies, weakens domestic industries further. As a result, consumers look for alternatives from international markets, worsening the decline of Zimbabwe’s industry.

In essence, Zanu PF’s protectionist measures are a cover, aimed at keeping power through dependency on the party. Real reforms are necessary to save Zimbabwe’s struggling industry. Until full changes are made, the industry’s recovery and stability will stay out of reach, making protectionism ineffective and wrong.

In conclusion, Zanu PF’s protectionist approach doesn’t fix the main issues hurting Zimbabwe’s economy. Real political and economic reforms are needed to save the industry and achieve lasting stability. Without true commitment to change, the industry’s decline will continue, and the protectionist cover will do little to fix the nation’s economic troubles.